sbc100 wrote: Can you explain why you want `call-indirect-overlong` in lime1? Is it because you want to be able to link files compiles with multi-table? i.e. do you want/expect type relocations at every call_indirect site? If so then perhaps a better name might be `call-indirect-relocatable`? Or maybe even `multi-table-compatible`? Sorry for the bikesheding and this late stage..
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117087 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
