================ @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O1 -emit-llvm -fextend-lifetimes -fsanitize=null -fsanitize-trap=null -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix TRAP %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O1 -emit-llvm -fextend-lifetimes -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix FAKEUSE %s + +// With -fextend-lifetimes the compiler generated a fake.use of a +// reference variable at the end of the function, in the cleanup block. This prompted the +// address sanitizer to verify that the variable has been allocated properly, even when +// the function returns early. +// We check that sanitizers are disabled for code generated for the benefit of fake.use +// intrinsics, as well as that the fake.use is no longer generated in the cleanup block. +// It should be generated in the block preceding the cleanup block instead. ---------------- jmorse wrote:
Despite the filename containing "sanitizer", this test doesn't actually test sanitizer behaviour? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110102 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
