================ @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 --std=c++20 -fsyntax-only -Wdangling -Wdangling-field -Wreturn-stack-address -verify %s + +#include "Inputs/lifetime-analysis.h" ---------------- hokein wrote:
In my experience, a single and well-organized test file works effectively, as it simplifies adding new test cases. Having multiple files can add overhead, requiring extra effort to determine the right file for each new case. I generally prefer a workflow where new test cases are appended to one main file. > I think it would be much more readable if we would have a namespace per use > case or set of use cases where everything relevant to that use case would be > declared/defined and used. +1, I think the test can be improved by having a dedicated namespace per use case. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115921 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
