mgorny added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30025#678462, @theraven wrote:
> This code is working around something that's probably a clang bug. It would > be better to fix the clang bug than add more complex workarounds. Well, clang explicitly rejects those functions as errors, so I would guess it does that by design. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D30025 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
