c8ef wrote: > This seems reasonable to me - I'd recommend you take a look at the min/max > reductions to see if signed/unsigned can be correctly handled with this > approach.
Thank you for your suggestions! Signed integer overflow in C++ is undefined behavior and cannot occur in a constexpr context. I have addressed the issue in the latest revision. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116243 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
