jvoung wrote: Any other concerns? I think I've elaborated on why the ignore/exclude alternative is not better.
Otherwise, eventually, it would be great to be able to understand the various macros and how they could serve as checks for later accesses, but I think this is an improvement on the status quo (we've seen lots of such googletest false positives). Thanks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115051 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
