================ @@ -1315,6 +1319,34 @@ with its corresponding `Wno-` option. Note that when combined with :option:`-w` (which disables all warnings), disabling all warnings wins. +.. _warning_suppression_mappings: + +Controlling Diagnostics via Suppression Mappings +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Warning suppression mappings enable users to suppress Clang's diagnostics in a +per-file granular manner. Enabling enforcement of diagnostics in specific parts +of the project, even if there are violations in some headers. ---------------- AaronBallman wrote:
That's true, but I think we want to guide users towards fixing diagnostics rather than suppressing them. Users will use any suppression mechanisms we provide regardless of how we document it, so I don't think it's harmful to imply this is more about cases where you can't modify the code. But I also don't feel strongly. WDYT? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112517 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
