efriedma-quic wrote: To ensure we don't destroy objects that weren't constructed, you can use a guard variable of some sort, sure. I'm not quite sure what the goal is, here; are you trying to improve performance, or are you worried about the function pointers for security?
>>Also, I'm not sure objects are destroyed in the correct order. >Do you mean for the test case I added? I think they should be destroyed in >reverse order. No, I mean for objects in different translation units. I think the same translation unit works like you think. And different translation units maybe works for non-inline variables, assuming the loader iterates in the right direction? I think you might run into issues with inline variables? Not sure if this patch actually changes behavior for them. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115788 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
