mehdi_amini added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D13330#582607, @rsmith wrote:
> I think this attribute is poorly named. Explicit instantiation definitions > are *already* required to be globally unique; see [temp.spec]/5.1: > > "For a given template and a given set of template-arguments, an explicit > instantiation definition shall appear at most once in a program" So what prevents from emitting these as "strong" symbols without any attribute? We should have the guarantee that we have only one such copy in the program. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D13330 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits