================
@@ -8236,11 +8236,14 @@ void Sema::CheckShadow(NamedDecl *D, NamedDecl
*ShadowedDecl,
DeclContext *NewDC = D->getDeclContext();
if (FieldDecl *FD = dyn_cast<FieldDecl>(ShadowedDecl)) {
- // Fields are not shadowed by variables in C++ static methods.
- if (CXXMethodDecl *MD = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(NewDC))
+ if (CXXMethodDecl *MD = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(NewDC)) {
+ // Fields are not shadowed by variables in C++ static methods.
if (MD->isStatic())
return;
+ if (!MD->getParent()->isLambda() && MD->isExplicitObjectMemberFunction())
+ return;
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
It makes sense that that would fail, but I’m still a bit confused as to how we
end up w/ a `CXXMethodDecl` whose type (after desugaring) isn’t a
`FunctionProtoType`. If that *does* happen somehow, I should hope that
`isInvalidDecl()` also returns `true`, in which case you’d check for that first.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114813
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
