lenary wrote: Gentle Ping. I'm looking for answers to two questions:
- [Should I] prepare a fixup commit that [uses `MVT::Untyped`] (and removes the `riscv_*_pair` MVTs), if we think that's a better target-independent approach? - Any advice on whether I should be digging deeply into changing SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp (affecting all targets) so we don't need the `getNumRegisters` override? The options here IMO are a) live with the override, b) change SelectionDAGBuilder now, c) change SelectionDAGBuilder in a follow-up and remove the override once it is not needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112983 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
