chouzz wrote: > I thought about the _Constant_ tag. In Java for example, there is no `const` > keyword, instead the `final` keyword is used for variables to declare them as > read-only. The keyword `final` means something else for methods (they cannot > be overridden). The keywords and their meaning seem to be very > language-specific. Thus, I prefer removing the _Constant_ tag completely from > the LSP PR. I think, the _Read-only_ tag makes much more sense, since it is > more generic, and expresses better on a higher abstraction level what we mean. > > Do you agree? Then I'd adapt my PR on the LSP project accordingly.
I have no objections to this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113669 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
