jhuber6 wrote: > I'd prefer we have SYCL linking run through LLD rather than the > linker-wrapper tool approach, but I don't feel strongly enough to block this. I see this as a temporary hack around not having a proper SPIR-V linker / backend in LLVM yet. It's less of a linker-wrapper tool and more of my assertions that every single target should be able to be targeted directly via `clang --target=...` which then lets the linker wrapper just do the part where it extracts GPU code from fat binaries, invokes `clang` on each to get an executable, then wraps that in the runtime's registration code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
