================
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// Tests the driver when linking LLVM IR bitcode files and targeting SPIR-V
+// architecture.
+//
+// RUN: touch %t.bc
+// RUN: %clangxx --target=spirv64 --sycl-link -### %t.bc 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LINK
+// LINK: "{{.*}}clang-sycl-linker{{.*}}" "{{.*}}.bc" "-o" "a.out"
+//
+// Test that -Xlinker options are being passed to clang-sycl-linker.
+// RUN: %clangxx -### --target=spirv64 --sycl-link -Xlinker
--llvm-spirv-path=/tmp \
+// RUN: -Xlinker --library-path=/tmp -Xlinker --device-libs=lib1.bc,lib2.bc
%t.bc 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=XLINKEROPTS
+// XLINKEROPTS: "{{.*}}clang-sycl-linker{{.*}}" "--llvm-spirv-path=/tmp"
"--library-path=/tmp" "--device-libs=lib1.bc,lib2.bc" "{{.*}}.bc" "-o" "a.out"
----------------
bader wrote:
This test case seems to cover everything that's checked in the previous test
case. Can we drop the previous test case and leave only this one?
```suggestion
// RUN: %clangxx -### --target=spirv64 --sycl-link -Xlinker
--llvm-spirv-path=/tmp \
// RUN: -Xlinker --library-path=/tmp -Xlinker --device-libs=lib1.bc,lib2.bc
%t.bc 2>&1 \
// RUN: | FileCheck %s
// CHECK: "{{.*}}clang-sycl-linker{{.*}}" "--llvm-spirv-path=/tmp"
"--library-path=/tmp" "--device-libs=lib1.bc,lib2.bc" "{{.*}}.bc" "-o" "a.out"
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
