AaronBallman wrote:

In principle, I'm not opposed, but if cl.exe doesn't support the syntax for 
their vendor string, I don't know that we should support it ourselves. The 
signal of support from @StephanTLavavej is definitely a point in favor of going 
this route, but I'd feel most comfortable if we were following cl's lead rather 
than going off on our own.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113765
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to