Author: marshall Date: Tue Feb 7 09:34:20 2017 New Revision: 294311 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294311&view=rev Log: Mark LWG2784 as ready
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=294311&r1=294310&r2=294311&view=diff ============================================================================== --- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original) +++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Tue Feb 7 09:34:20 2017 @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769">2769</a></td><td>Redundant const in the return type of any_cast(const any&)</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2781">2781</a></td><td>Contradictory requirements for std::function and std::reference_wrapper</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2782">2782</a></td><td>scoped_allocator_adaptor constructors must be constrained</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr> - <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2784">2784</a></td><td>Resolution to LWG 2484 is missing "otherwise, no effects" and is hard to parse</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr> + <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2784">2784</a></td><td>Resolution to LWG 2484 is missing "otherwise, no effects" and is hard to parse</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2785">2785</a></td><td>quoted should work with basic_string_view</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2786">2786</a></td><td>Annex C should mention shared_ptr changes for array support</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2787">2787</a></td><td>§[file_status.cons] doesn't match class definition</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ <li>2769 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li> <li>2781 - </li> <li>2782 - Looks straightforward.</li> -<li>2784 - I think we do this already; maybe more tests (esp about 'inaccessible base class')</li> +<li>2784 - Patch Ready</li> <li>2785 - We do this already.</li> <li>2786 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li> <li>2787 - Eric? </li> _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits