fsfod wrote: > What are the implications/requirements for users of DataflowAnalysis? Every > instance specifices it's own lattice, which is converted to/from llvm::Any. > Will every lattice definition require these new declarations?
If you think they will be used from external from the llvm library including by tests then yes. I wish i could just put the visibility attribute on the Any Id field its self, but windows uses two different attributes to import and export a symbol which causes issues when its used by different codebases that require it to be in a different state. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108051 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
