vitalybuka wrote: > LGTM - would love some eyes from more established folks to make sure we are > not breaking any bw-compatability foo, and seeing as this spans the tree a > bit. > > Definitely I am for this change, I think the attr is more clear this way, and > we caught it before LLVM 20 was cut.
Having that it was just recently landed, I don't see a problem with breaking bw-comp. Did you consider `sanitize_blocking` ? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113155 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
