Meinersbur wrote: > I don’t personally think that the flang driver should ever attempt to link a > C++ library of any kind. FWIW while there’s no stdlib option to consider in > their case, g++ will never auto link the gfortran runtimes and gfortran will > never auto link libstdc++
gfortran doesn't have a flag that means "use this C++ standard library". Without this PR, Flang doesn't either which would be fine with me. OP would need to fix their build system. With this PR, `flang --help` will list an option `-stdlib` with the help text "C++ standard library to use". But it doesn't do anything. It feels like it would be ignoring `-lc++`. > If we were to do things this way, what should flang do if no -stdlib flag is > provided? Should it link the default C++ stdlib as clang++ does, or break > with clang++ and not link any C++ stdlib if nothing is provided? Both would > be surprising behavior in my opinion, and both would also risk breaking the > existing cmake support. No `-stdlib` means no linking to any C++ standard library for Flang, no change of behavior without the flag. It also does not break cmake support since it never passes `-stdlib` by itself. Just asking for the flag's behavior to match its description. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110598 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
