================ @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ; RUN: llvm-as -o %t.o %s ; RUN: llvm-as -o %t2.o %S/Inputs/libcall-archive.ll ; RUN: llvm-ar rcs %t.a %t2.o -; RUN: wasm-ld -o %t %t.o %t.a +; RUN: wasm-ld -mllvm -mattr=-bulk-memory -o %t %t.o %t.a ---------------- sbc100 wrote:
I was thinking that might make more sense yes. Seems like that would match better what llvm lto would produce. I don't feel strongly though. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112049 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
