================
@@ -299,13 +299,12 @@ ANALYZER_OPTION(
ANALYZER_OPTION(
bool, ShouldEagerlyAssume, "eagerly-assume",
- "Whether we should eagerly assume evaluations of conditionals, thus, "
- "bifurcating the path. This indicates how the engine should handle "
- "expressions such as: 'x = (y != 0)'. When this is true then the "
- "subexpression 'y != 0' will be eagerly assumed to be true or false, thus "
- "evaluating it to the integers 0 or 1 respectively. The upside is that "
- "this can increase analysis precision until we have a better way to lazily
"
- "evaluate such logic. The downside is that it eagerly bifurcates paths.",
+ "If this is enabled (the default behavior), when the analyzer encounters "
+ "a comparison operator or logical negation, it immediately splits the "
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:
Good point, if you implement it in a follow-up non-NFC commit, I'd be happy to
review it. (Alternatively, we could create a todo note / github ticket etc. to
record this.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112209
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
