mehdi_amini added a comment. > My concern with that approach is that we'd just end up playing whack-a-bug. > It's possible that this fix puts us in a similar situation, but I'm honestly > at a loss for a better approach. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (...And I'd kinda prefer to play > whack-a-bug with "clang could do a better job in this case" reports, rather > than "clang crashes on my code" reports.)
Agree, thanks :) This patch LGTM but I have little confidence in myself in this area of the compiler, so I rather have someone else stamping it! https://reviews.llvm.org/D29469 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
