pskrgag wrote: > I'd love to better understand what is the root cause for these weird > diagnostics when the functions are inlined
The problem was in `if (C.wasInlined)` logic in old version. So checker was not modeling all inlined functions. If we drop that check and just allow modeling inline functions, there will be a following problem: ```cpp void close_outline(zx_handle_t handle ZX_ACQUIRE_HANDLE); void close_inline(zx_handle_t handle ZX_ACQUIRE_HANDLE) // <- Modeled close here. handle state is now "Closed" { close_outline(handle); // <- Use after close report } ``` The same goes for `acquire` logic/ I guess, this kind of reports could be suppressed by custom bug visitor, but I thougth `evalCall` approach is more clean. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111588 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits