jhuber6 wrote: > > @petrhosek Can someone explain why the clang executable in these tests is > > called `llvm` on the Fuchsia bots? > > We enable the > [`LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_DRIVER_BUILD`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/48deb3568eb2452ff385b04b8f71c34121f47387/clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia-stage2.cmake#L40) > option where all tools are linked together into a single binary called > `llvm` and the build generates symlinks, so for example `clang` would be a > symlink to `llvm` which is equivalent to invoking `llvm clang <args>`. The > fact that you're seeing just just `llvm` without a second argument for the > tool looks like a latent bug.
Interesting, right now it just takes `argv[0]` so we should probably update that logic. Is the expected result in this case `llvm clang` or just `clang`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112041 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
