AaronBallman wrote:

Thanks for the details! I'd say let's hold off on adding these matchers; if you 
have a check that needs them, then you could look through clang-tidy to see if 
other checks have also added a local matcher for the same thing, and if there's 
two or more matchers needing it, then we'll add it as a global matcher.

As for the check itself, that looks like an interesting one!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90634
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to