================ @@ -1103,6 +1105,13 @@ bool ConstructDecompositionT<C, H>::applyClause( return applyToOutermost(node); } +template <typename C, typename H> +bool ConstructDecompositionT<C, H>::applyClause( + const tomp::clause::OmpxBareT<TypeTy, IdTy, ExprTy> &clause, + const ClauseTy *node) { + return applyToAll(node); ---------------- skatrak wrote:
I see, if it involves some slightly different semantics then I agree that it should be represented separately. In that case, having it attached to `omp.target` seems reasonable to me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111106 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits