PeterChou1 wrote: > That's a fair point. For the API surface we're exposing, it may be better to > make those private to the implementation, or at least > not part of the public header. To some extend that's dependent on how the > library will be used in practice, though. @PeterChou1 > what are your > thoughts here?
Yea I agree the only API for user is the Template class I can refactor the rest of classes out of the header files. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105893 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
