================ @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,c_diagnostics -Wmissing-format-attribute %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wmissing-format-attribute -fdiagnostics-parseable-fixits %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -verify=expected,cpp_diagnostics -Wmissing-format-attribute %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -verify=expected,cpp_diagnostics -std=c++2b -Wmissing-format-attribute %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -verify=expected,cpp_diagnostics -std=c++23 -Wmissing-format-attribute %s ---------------- Endilll wrote:
Yes, `c++2b` and `c++23` refer to the same language mode. I think when `c++23` was added, all uses of `c++2b` in the tests were replaced. We should be consistent with that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105479 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
