zygoloid wrote: Specifically: we do perform address comparisons between these strings, so the address is significant. And we can have identical string content but different types:
- for types whose name involves anything with internal linkage - for types with hidden visibility - when loading a DSO using `RTLD_LOCAL` so in a few cases allowing merging could be bad. Most of that only applies during dynamic linking. Do we have a guarantee that `unnamed_addr` is dropped before dynamic linking? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111343 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
