================
@@ -15609,6 +15609,14 @@
TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformCXXFoldExpr(CXXFoldExpr *E) {
return true;
}
+ // When there's only one expansion, the parentheses can be safely eliminated
+ // to avoid any extra redundancy that may result in incorrect checks.
+ // For example, transforming (((args == 0) || ...)) into (args == 0)
+ // allows the omission of parentheses while ensuring precise representation
+ // and avoiding warnings regarding redundant parentheses.
+ if (*NumExpansions == 1 && !E->isTypeDependent())
----------------
a-tarasyuk wrote:
Since it's only known to occur with fold expressions, should it just be a bool,
or would it be better to use an enum?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110761
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
