AlexVlx wrote: > > I don't think we should rely on these on the host at all, the addition was > > a design mistake initially, we probably should not double down on it. > > I agree with it in principle. However, removing things that already exist > should be done with consideration for the existing users. This particular > macro may happen to be working well enough for some users and we may want to > consider whether we can transition from here to the point where these macros > no longer exist on the host, without causing much disruption, or, at least, > giving the affected users enough of heads-up time to deal with it.
Sure, I'm not arguing that we should just delete these outright and have folks deal with the aftermath. I'm just biased towards deprecation + actual removal because I think this existing is just going to become increasingly problematic as we go forward. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109663 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
