carlosgalvezp wrote: > > Why isn't `misc` suitable for this use case? > > `bugprone` was just an initial thought. If the group think leads us to `misc` > I'm ok with moving in that direction. Other thoughts?
Maybe i misunderstood, I thought you meant creating a new clang-tidy module called `advisory`. `bugprone` sounds good to me! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110471 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
