everythingfunctional wrote: > Since we are making this change now, should this PR be updated to follow > clang's scheme of having `clang` point to `clang-$version`?
Sure. I've added what I believe does that. > Having multiple active PR's for one change is IMHO rather confusing. It > creates unnecessary duplication - why do we expect people to review the same > change twice? Apologies. I didn't mean to create a duplicate or hijack this, but I thought any previous PRs were likely stale and would be more difficult to resurrect than to just rerun a simple `find`/`sed` command. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110023 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
