================
@@ -231,6 +245,10 @@ linux_projects_to_test=$(exclude-linux
$(compute-projects-to-test ${modified_pro
linux_check_targets=$(check-targets ${linux_projects_to_test} | sort | uniq)
linux_projects=$(add-dependencies ${linux_projects_to_test} | sort | uniq)
+linux_runtimes_to_test=$(compute-runtimes-to-test ${linux_projects_to_test})
----------------
joker-eph wrote:
Sure, in theory... But that seems like a stretch to me.
I remember recently that clang folks argued to removed the flang tests when
changing clang because of the likelihood of breaking Flang with clang tests.
I'm not sure the probability of a random LLVM change breaking clang in a way
that would only show up with a runtime tests and no other LLVM/clang test is
higher!
The ratio value / cost isn't clear to me right now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93318
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
