Xazax-hun wrote:
I think the interesting template cases are like things like:
```
template<typename T> struct S {
T foo();
};
S<int> a;
S<SWIFT_SENDABLE int> b;
void f() {
a.foo();
b.foo();
}
```
The question is, whether we actually have the type attributes where we expect
to have them, or do we lose them?
Hopefully @erichkeane can correct me if I'm wrong.
That being said, one question is whether we actually need type attributes to be
propagated in this case for Swift's interop.
For the release notes, you'd want to mention that `swift_attr` can now be
applied to types (maybe a small motivation why) in
`clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`. It has a section for attribute changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108631
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
