kito-cheng wrote: > @kito-cheng I need your input on this, since this would require a few updates > on various PRs to the RISC-V specs.
Yeah, I just chat with Craig, I think that right way to go, and actually the PR in riscv-toolchain-conventions I has implicitly allow that, I mean I only write `-fcf-protection=return` require `zimop`, and didn't say `-fcf-protection=branch` require `zicfilp`, so yeah, go ahead to drop the requirement of `zicfilp`, Craig and me will fix that on the back-end side :P [1] https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-toolchain-conventions/pull/54 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
