https://github.com/paulwalker-arm commented:

Sorry, my comments are a bit all over the place, but I'm concerned we've not 
defined enough (and/or I need to understand what it means to be a storage only 
type) for me to confidently accept this PR.

If possible, my suggestion is to detach the scalar type support from the vector 
type support because I think the vector side of things is more complete from a 
specification point of view.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97277
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to