hvdijk wrote:

Apologies, but I'm having a bit of trouble understanding the scenario that this 
PR addresses. It looks like it's meant to handle the case where 
`LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR` does not contain the LLVM binaries, is that right? In 
that case, why can `LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR` not instead be set to a path that 
does contain the LLVM binaries?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105969
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to