https://github.com/mylai-mtk updated 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600

>From 3cae49e7cbff687c1303f8204f70c9c1105a9560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming-Yi Lai <ming-yi....@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:40:48 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][RISCV] Accept -fcf-protection=branch when Zicfilp
 extension is on

-fcf-protection=branch turns on indirect branching protection on RISC-V targets
with Zicfilp extension.
---
 clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h                |  7 +++++++
 clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c

diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h
index b808ccc8e9cfe9..13d4b4c04ce8e0 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h
@@ -131,6 +131,13 @@ class RISCVTargetInfo : public TargetInfo {
   bool supportsCpuInit() const override { return getTriple().isOSLinux(); }
   bool validateCpuSupports(StringRef Feature) const override;
   bool isValidFeatureName(StringRef Name) const override;
+
+  bool
+  checkCFProtectionBranchSupported(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) const override {
+    if (ISAInfo->hasExtension("zicfilp"))
+      return true;
+    return TargetInfo::checkCFProtectionBranchSupported(Diags);
+  }
 };
 class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY RISCV32TargetInfo : public RISCVTargetInfo {
 public:
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c 
b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..56a3c48cde53a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target

>From 3ac3d29294232f6688d8e570aac8f57a5262df05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming-Yi Lai <ming-yi....@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 19:00:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] [Clang] Introduce
 -fcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled|func-sig

This flag controls the scheme of the labels of landing pad insns. Landing pad
insns are special insns that mark the targets of indirect jumps. In RISC-V
Zicfilp extension, its landing pad insn further encodes a field of `label',
which can be used to limit the sources of indirect jumps to those that set up a
matching label according to a `scheme' selected at compile time. This flag
controls the selection of that `scheme'. It's named `-fcf-branch-label-scheme`
since the generation of landing pad insns is turned on by
`-fcf-protection=branch`.
---
 .../include/clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h | 22 ++++++++
 clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def  |  2 +
 clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h    |  1 +
 clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def     |  2 +
 clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h       |  2 +
 clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h        |  4 ++
 clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td         |  4 ++
 clang/lib/Basic/TargetInfo.cpp                |  5 ++
 clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h               |  4 ++
 clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h                 |  4 ++
 clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp         |  4 ++
 clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp     | 37 +++++++++++++
 .../test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c  | 52 ++++++++++++++++---
 13 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 clang/include/clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h

diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h 
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..d97f8489c4631f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+//===--- CFProtectionOptions.h ----------------------------------*- C++ 
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM 
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+//  This file defines constants for -fcf-protection and other related flags.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_BASIC_CFPROTECTIONOPTIONS_H
+#define LLVM_CLANG_BASIC_CFPROTECTIONOPTIONS_H
+
+namespace clang {
+
+enum class CFBranchLabelSchemeKind { Default, Unlabeled, FuncSig };
+
+} // namespace clang
+
+#endif // #ifndef LLVM_CLANG_BASIC_CFPROTECTIONOPTIONS_H
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def 
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def
index b600198998d85b..de7ae73f8a603b 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ CODEGENOPT(CFProtectionReturn , 1, 0) ///< if 
-fcf-protection is
                                       ///< set to full or return.
 CODEGENOPT(CFProtectionBranch , 1, 0) ///< if -fcf-protection is
                                       ///< set to full or branch.
+ENUM_CODEGENOPT(CFBranchLabelScheme, CFBranchLabelSchemeKind, 2,
+    CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Default) ///< if -mcf-branch-label-scheme is set.
 CODEGENOPT(FunctionReturnThunks, 1, 0) ///< 
-mfunction-return={keep|thunk-extern}
 CODEGENOPT(IndirectBranchCSPrefix, 1, 0) ///< if -mindirect-branch-cs-prefix
                                          ///< is set.
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h 
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h
index f2a707a8ba8d76..a6953c17a447ef 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #ifndef LLVM_CLANG_BASIC_CODEGENOPTIONS_H
 #define LLVM_CLANG_BASIC_CODEGENOPTIONS_H
 
+#include "clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/PointerAuthOptions.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/Sanitizers.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/XRayInstr.h"
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def 
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def
index fd3346d29f26a3..68db400c22e6c1 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def
@@ -364,6 +364,8 @@ 
BENIGN_LANGOPT(CompatibilityQualifiedIdBlockParamTypeChecking, 1, 0,
 LANGOPT(ObjCDisableDirectMethodsForTesting, 1, 0,
         "Disable recognition of objc_direct methods")
 LANGOPT(CFProtectionBranch , 1, 0, "Control-Flow Branch Protection enabled")
+ENUM_LANGOPT(CFBranchLabelScheme, CFBranchLabelSchemeKind, 2, 
CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Default,
+             "Control-Flow Branch Protection Label Scheme")
 LANGOPT(FakeAddressSpaceMap , 1, 0, "OpenCL fake address space map")
 ENUM_LANGOPT(AddressSpaceMapMangling , AddrSpaceMapMangling, 2, ASMM_Target, 
"OpenCL address space map mangling mode")
 LANGOPT(IncludeDefaultHeader, 1, 0, "Include default header file for OpenCL")
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h 
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h
index 6c186c410e158d..c3d53ca92d450c 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #ifndef LLVM_CLANG_BASIC_LANGOPTIONS_H
 #define LLVM_CLANG_BASIC_LANGOPTIONS_H
 
+#include "clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/CommentOptions.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/LangStandard.h"
@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ class LangOptionsBase {
 public:
   using Visibility = clang::Visibility;
   using RoundingMode = llvm::RoundingMode;
+  using CFBranchLabelSchemeKind = clang::CFBranchLabelSchemeKind;
 
   enum GCMode { NonGC, GCOnly, HybridGC };
   enum StackProtectorMode { SSPOff, SSPOn, SSPStrong, SSPReq };
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h 
b/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h
index f31d88a354ea28..d96a4fcca56840 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 
 #include "clang/Basic/AddressSpaces.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/BitmaskEnum.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/CFProtectionOptions.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/LangOptions.h"
@@ -1727,6 +1728,9 @@ class TargetInfo : public TransferrableTargetInfo,
   virtual bool
   checkCFProtectionBranchSupported(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) const;
 
+  /// Get the target default CFBranchLabelScheme scheme
+  virtual CFBranchLabelSchemeKind getDefaultCFBranchLabelScheme() const;
+
   /// Check if the target supports CFProtection return.
   virtual bool
   checkCFProtectionReturnSupported(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) const;
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td 
b/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
index 376d7d4290c0bf..e6a46b9fb909e0 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
@@ -2841,6 +2841,10 @@ def fcf_protection : Flag<["-"], "fcf-protection">, 
Group<f_Group>,
   Visibility<[ClangOption, CLOption, CC1Option]>,
   Alias<fcf_protection_EQ>, AliasArgs<["full"]>,
   HelpText<"Enable cf-protection in 'full' mode">;
+def mcf_branch_label_scheme_EQ : Joined<["-"], "mcf-branch-label-scheme=">,
+  Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option]>, Group<m_Group>,
+  HelpText<"Select label scheme for branch control-flow architecture 
protection">,
+  Values<"unlabeled,func-sig">;
 def mfunction_return_EQ : Joined<["-"], "mfunction-return=">,
   Group<m_Group>, Visibility<[ClangOption, CLOption, CC1Option]>,
   HelpText<"Replace returns with jumps to ``__x86_return_thunk`` (x86 only, 
error otherwise)">,
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/TargetInfo.cpp b/clang/lib/Basic/TargetInfo.cpp
index 29f5cd14e46e11..8dfd10984ce685 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/TargetInfo.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/TargetInfo.cpp
@@ -192,6 +192,11 @@ void TargetInfo::resetDataLayout(StringRef DL, const char 
*ULP) {
   UserLabelPrefix = ULP;
 }
 
+CFBranchLabelSchemeKind TargetInfo::getDefaultCFBranchLabelScheme() const {
+  // if this hook is called, the target should override it
+  llvm::report_fatal_error("not implemented");
+}
+
 bool
 TargetInfo::checkCFProtectionBranchSupported(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) const {
   Diags.Report(diag::err_opt_not_valid_on_target) << "cf-protection=branch";
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h
index 13d4b4c04ce8e0..e375ea78cdf62f 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.h
@@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ class RISCVTargetInfo : public TargetInfo {
       return true;
     return TargetInfo::checkCFProtectionBranchSupported(Diags);
   }
+
+  CFBranchLabelSchemeKind getDefaultCFBranchLabelScheme() const override {
+    return CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::FuncSig;
+  };
 };
 class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY RISCV32TargetInfo : public RISCVTargetInfo {
 public:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
index a99ae62984c7d5..77d55257f8c52a 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
@@ -273,6 +273,10 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY X86TargetInfo : public 
TargetInfo {
     return TargetInfo::checkCFProtectionBranchSupported(Diags);
   };
 
+  CFBranchLabelSchemeKind getDefaultCFBranchLabelScheme() const override {
+    return CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Unlabeled;
+  };
+
   virtual bool validateOperandSize(const llvm::StringMap<bool> &FeatureMap,
                                    StringRef Constraint, unsigned Size) const;
 
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp 
b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
index 0bab48caf1a5e2..d3c5c3d9872ee4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
@@ -7012,6 +7012,10 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction 
&JA,
   if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fcf_protection_EQ)) {
     CmdArgs.push_back(
         Args.MakeArgString(Twine("-fcf-protection=") + A->getValue()));
+
+    if (Arg *SA = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mcf_branch_label_scheme_EQ))
+      CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(Twine("-mcf-branch-label-scheme=") +
+                                           SA->getValue()));
   }
 
   if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mfunction_return_EQ))
diff --git a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp 
b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
index efd852593468aa..1268eaa466e654 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
@@ -1688,6 +1688,19 @@ void CompilerInvocationBase::GenerateCodeGenArgs(const 
CodeGenOptions &Opts,
   else if (Opts.CFProtectionBranch)
     GenerateArg(Consumer, OPT_fcf_protection_EQ, "branch");
 
+  if (Opts.CFProtectionBranch) {
+    switch (Opts.getCFBranchLabelScheme()) {
+    case CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Default:
+      break;
+    case CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Unlabeled:
+      GenerateArg(Consumer, OPT_mcf_branch_label_scheme_EQ, "unlabeled");
+      break;
+    case CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::FuncSig:
+      GenerateArg(Consumer, OPT_mcf_branch_label_scheme_EQ, "func-sig");
+      break;
+    }
+  }
+
   if (Opts.FunctionReturnThunks)
     GenerateArg(Consumer, OPT_mfunction_return_EQ, "thunk-extern");
 
@@ -2022,6 +2035,20 @@ bool CompilerInvocation::ParseCodeGenArgs(CodeGenOptions 
&Opts, ArgList &Args,
       Diags.Report(diag::err_drv_invalid_value) << A->getAsString(Args) << 
Name;
   }
 
+  if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_mcf_branch_label_scheme_EQ)) {
+    if (Opts.CFProtectionBranch) {
+      const StringRef Scheme = A->getValue();
+      if (Scheme == "unlabeled")
+        Opts.setCFBranchLabelScheme(CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Unlabeled);
+      else if (Scheme == "func-sig")
+        Opts.setCFBranchLabelScheme(CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::FuncSig);
+      else
+        Diags.Report(diag::err_drv_invalid_value)
+            << A->getAsString(Args) << Scheme;
+    } else
+      Diags.Report(diag::warn_drv_unused_argument) << A->getAsString(Args);
+  }
+
   if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_mfunction_return_EQ)) {
     auto Val = 
llvm::StringSwitch<llvm::FunctionReturnThunksKind>(A->getValue())
                    .Case("keep", llvm::FunctionReturnThunksKind::Keep)
@@ -3952,6 +3979,16 @@ bool CompilerInvocation::ParseLangArgs(LangOptions 
&Opts, ArgList &Args,
     }
   }
 
+  if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_mcf_branch_label_scheme_EQ)) {
+    if (Opts.CFProtectionBranch) {
+      const StringRef Scheme = A->getValue();
+      if (Scheme == "unlabeled")
+        Opts.setCFBranchLabelScheme(CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Unlabeled);
+      else if (Scheme == "func-sig")
+        Opts.setCFBranchLabelScheme(CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::FuncSig);
+    }
+  }
+
   if ((Args.hasArg(OPT_fsycl_is_device) || Args.hasArg(OPT_fsycl_is_host)) &&
       !Args.hasArg(OPT_sycl_std_EQ)) {
     // If the user supplied -fsycl-is-device or -fsycl-is-host, but failed to
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c 
b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
index 56a3c48cde53a1..02a22006b1638f 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
@@ -1,18 +1,58 @@
-// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
 // RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
-// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
 
-// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
 // RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
 
-// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
-// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
 
-// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch -c %s \
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
 // RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
 
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
 // CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
 // CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled'
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig'

>From ce2a105e424ddd039cb56b06fe95c33ff17406a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming-Yi Lai <ming-yi....@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 14:16:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] [clang][RISCV] Add Zicfilp CFI scheme preprocessor macros

These macros allow assembly files to know which CFI label to use when the target
has Zicfilp enabled.
---
 clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp             | 20 ++++++++++++
 .../test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c  | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp 
b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
index a4925e84784af9..9382645d2c7110 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
@@ -224,6 +224,26 @@ void RISCVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions 
&Opts,
     else
       Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_32e");
   }
+
+  if (ISAInfo->hasExtension("zicfilp") && Opts.CFProtectionBranch) {
+    auto Scheme = Opts.getCFBranchLabelScheme();
+    if (Scheme == CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Default)
+      Scheme = getDefaultCFBranchLabelScheme();
+
+    switch (Scheme) {
+    case CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Unlabeled:
+      Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_landing_pad", "1");
+      Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_landing_pad_unlabeled", "1");
+      break;
+    case CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::Default:
+      llvm_unreachable("default cf-branch-label scheme should already be "
+                       "transformed to other scheme");
+    case CFBranchLabelSchemeKind::FuncSig:
+      Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_landing_pad", "1");
+      Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_landing_pad_func_sig", "1");
+      break;
+    }
+  }
 }
 
 static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfo[] = {
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c 
b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
index 02a22006b1638f..a2b41dbd8b7c10 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-cf-protection.c
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+// Default cf-branch-label-scheme is func-sig
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+
 // RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
 // RUN:   -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
 // RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
@@ -24,6 +42,16 @@
 // RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
 
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN:   -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN:   -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+
 // RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
 // RUN:   -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
 // RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
@@ -50,6 +78,10 @@
 // RUN:   -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
 
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad_unlabeled 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad_func_sig 1{{$}}
 // CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
 // CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target
 // CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to