================
@@ -753,13 +753,7 @@ CodeGenTypes::arrangeCall(const CGFunctionInfo &signature,
                                  signature.getRequiredArgs());
 }
 
-namespace clang {
-namespace CodeGen {
-void computeSPIRKernelABIInfo(CodeGenModule &CGM, CGFunctionInfo &FI);
-}
-}
----------------
ilovepi wrote:

I'm not sure I understand the motivation of moving this. Why is it more 
desirable to have this in the header? A search shows only 3 uses of the symbol 
in the tree 
(https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Allvm%2Fllvm-project%20computeSPIRKernelABIInfo&type=code).
 Given that additional headers are required to declare this in `CGCall.h`, I'd 
say we may prefer the forward declaration. I'm basing that on 
https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#include-as-little-as-possible, so 
unless there's a good reason to deviate, I'd suggest dropping this part. It 
also doesn't seem related to the rest of the patch.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109431
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to