kadircet wrote: thanks a lot for taking care of this @AaronBallman, I think the only concern here is not regressing clangd functionality. We can figure out how we should trim down the bits that're moving into clangd later if need be. I think this LG, but cc @hokein as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109154 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
