AlexVlx wrote: > @AlexVlx I don't see much objections against #108528 on a conceptual level, > so what do you think about merging it into this PR in a way that I commented > above, by changing `getMemScope()` and moving `getOrInsertSyncScopeID()` into > its static vars initialization?
At a glance it seems fine, thank you for working through this, but since I've been away for a couple of days let me page things back in first:) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106429 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
