AaronBallman wrote: > > Thanks! Making sure I follow along, basically you're saying this patch is > > good because it keeps the ^^ token reserved, and if/when OpenCL supports > > C++, it can then use this token for reflection in C++ (if that's chosen by > > WG21 for the syntax) or use it for its own needs? > > Exactly! > > > One thing to make sure we're both on the same page for -- should the OpenCL > > spec folks be alerted to the fact that ^^ as a single token conflicts with > > blocks in C? (That suggests it's perhaps not a good token to use for a > > binary operator and maybe they want to un-reserve it?) > > It may make sense to report this indeed. An issue can be submitted to this > repo: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-Docs. > > CC: @svenvh
Thank you, I filed https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-Docs/issues/1264 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108224 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
