zyn0217 wrote: > Even if I think the change is fairly low risk, I'm not sure a > crash-on-invalid is critical enough to backport (we are at ~1 week of the > release)
I understand the point, but my thought is that we'd want as less regressions as possible; OTOH, the crash-on-invalid could also affect clangd, when the user happens to be typing something invalid. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108148 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
