MatzeB wrote:

Please provide additional context in your summary on how this happens.

My understanding is that this is for a setup with linux binfmt-misc + qemu 
running aarch64 binaries on an x86 system. The fact that we end up with 
absolute pathnames in `argv[0]` may be a bug in qemu or binfmt-misc or maybe 
it's not specified in posix etc. and any behavior is allowed (I don't really 
know).

Given this only affects 4 tests in all of `llvm-project` I think it is fine to 
just adapt the tests (even if it would turn out incorrect behavior).

So LGTM but maybe wait a couple days in case there are different opinions.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107974
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to