MatzeB wrote: Please provide additional context in your summary on how this happens.
My understanding is that this is for a setup with linux binfmt-misc + qemu running aarch64 binaries on an x86 system. The fact that we end up with absolute pathnames in `argv[0]` may be a bug in qemu or binfmt-misc or maybe it's not specified in posix etc. and any behavior is allowed (I don't really know). Given this only affects 4 tests in all of `llvm-project` I think it is fine to just adapt the tests (even if it would turn out incorrect behavior). So LGTM but maybe wait a couple days in case there are different opinions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107974 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits