================
@@ -6784,6 +6784,10 @@ def warn_arc_lifetime_result_type : Warning<
"ARC %select{unused|__unsafe_unretained|__strong|__weak|__autoreleasing}0 "
"lifetime qualifier on return type is ignored">,
InGroup<IgnoredQualifiers>;
+def warn_next_larger_fp_type_same_size_than_fp : Warning<
+ "higher precision floating-point type requested by user size has the same
size"
----------------
zahiraam wrote:
> This warning doesn't make sense to me. Ignoring the weird grammar, the user
> didn't choose the higher precision type. The compiler chooses how it does the
> computation.
>
> If the issue here that the target doesn't support a higher precision
> floating-point type, we should just say that.
Yes, I can change the diagnostic comment to say that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107397
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
