================
@@ -961,6 +961,7 @@ static const Expr 
*SubstituteConstraintExpressionWithoutSatisfaction(
 
   if (MLTAL.getNumSubstitutedLevels() == 0)
     return ConstrExpr;
+  MLTAL.setKind(TemplateSubstitutionKind::Rewrite);
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:

I presume this avoids creating Subst* nodes for the substitution, right?
Could you explain what we would gain from / the difference it makes this way?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107942
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to