================
@@ -4022,7 +4022,10 @@
CodeCompleteConsumer::OverloadCandidate::CreateSignatureString(
std::string Name;
llvm::raw_string_ostream OS(Name);
- FDecl->getDeclName().print(OS, Policy);
+ auto const DeclName = (getKind() == CK_Lambda)
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
This isn't the place for diagnostics. I think we're actually printing the
DeclarationName for the function signature help, so we don't end up with an
`operator()` in the lambda case.
<img width="314" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/006ac25d-b7cb-4895-b340-d9e5f9b05a37";>
(This is what it looks like for lambdas currently)
I hope this could properly fall back to the previous logic if the lambda
expression weren't declared with a name.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101857
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
