zyn0217 wrote:

> This looks reasonable but for pack expressions we added a 
> `ExpandedToEmptyPack` instead and i think there is value in having 
> consistency between types and expression packs indexing. WDYT?

Makes sense to me :)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107181
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to