Valentin Clement =?utf-8?b?KOODkOODrOODsw=?=,Kyungwoo Lee <kyu...@meta.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104...@github.com>
ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > > Got it. I am pretty interested use case for modules. And from your commit > > history, it looks like you prefer header units than named modules? > > Yes, we prefer header units for the time being because it can be implemented > with minimal sources changes and gives moderate compile time improvements. > Also it should open future path to named modules. Also with header units we > have some flexibility how to compose modules. In our experiments build time > perforce significantly depends on number of modules required for compilation > number of AST nodes that are merged. Got it. Looking for your public reports : ) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104512 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
